Assessment of early sepsis recognition scores: experience from a quarternary hospital in Brazil

Main Article Content

Gabriela Franco Paes de Figueiredo
Marcia Ferreira dos Santos Silva
André Miguel Japiassu
Andrea D’Avila Freitas
Guilherme Bastos Fortes
Moyses Pinto Coelho Duarte Damasceno
Simone da Silva Vinhas
Vitor Dominato Rocha
Nathalia Antônio de Oliveira Velasco
Pedro Ramos Brandão de Melo
Aline D’Avila Pereira
Natalia Chilinque Zambão da Silva

Abstract

 






 Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of screening tools for the early detection of sepsis. Methods: A prospective study that included 443 sepsis protocols from a quaternary hospital in Rio de Janeiro between January and August 2023. The sensitivity and specificity of three tools were compared: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and National Early Warning Score (NEWS). Results: Among patients with septic shock, 88% had a NEWS score > 4, while 74% of sepsis cases also had this score. NEWS stood out with a sensitivity of 87% for septic shock and 74% for sepsis, outperforming the other tools in both cases. Additionally, qSOFA was more specific, with 89% specificity for sepsis. Most patients were elderly and female, with initial screening indicating a high level of risk. Conclusion: The study underscores the importance of early identification of sepsis, recommending the use of NEWS as the primary tool in emergency services. Although conducted at a single center, the findings encourage the adoption of NEWS-based protocols to improve outcomes in sepsis management. 





Article Details

How to Cite
Franco Paes de Figueiredo, G., Ferreira dos Santos Silva, M., Miguel Japiassu, A., D’Avila Freitas, A., Bastos Fortes, G., Pinto Coelho Duarte Damasceno, M., … Chilinque Zambão da Silva, N. (2024). Assessment of early sepsis recognition scores:: experience from a quarternary hospital in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.54143/jbmede.v4i3.204
Section
Original Article

References

1. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Biblioteca Virtual da Saúde. 13/9 – Dia

Mundial da Sepse. [citado 2024 Ago 5]. Disponível em: https://

bvsms.saude.gov.br/13-9-dia-mundial-da-sepse-3/

2. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan

DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and

mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease

Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200-211.

3. Gavelli F, Castello LM, Avanzi GC. Management of sepsis and

septic shock in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med.

2021;16(6):1649-61.

4. Sousa AS, Soares GR, Severo LT, Oliveira AP, Santarém MD,

Caregnato RC. Escores utilizados em suspeita/diagnóstico de

sepse. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2022;30:e67662.

5. Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Empresa Brasileira de Serviços

Hospitalares. Escore para alerta precoce. Brasília, DF: Ministério

da Educação; 2020 [citado 2024 Ago 5]. Disponível em: https://

www.gov.br/ebserh/pt-br/hospitais-universitarios/regiaosudeste/

hu-ufjf/saude/escore-para-alerta-precoce-1/escorepara-

alerta-precoce

6. Lohn A, Martins MS, Câmara LT, Malfussi LB, Lazzari DD,

Nascimento ER, et al. Perfil epidemiológico e clínico de pacientes

com suspeita de sepse e choque séptico em emergência hospitalar.

Reme: Rev Min Enferm. 2021;25:e-1415.

7. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane

D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for

Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-10.

8. Usman OA, Usman AA, Ward MA. Comparison of SIRS, qSOFA,

and NEWS for the early identification of sepsis in the Emergency

Department. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(8):1490-7.

9. Chakraborty RK, Burns B. Systemic Inflammatory Response

Syndrome. [Updated 2023 May 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet].

Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

10. Lohn A, Martins MS, Câmara LT, Malfussi LB, Lazzari DD,

Nascimento ER, et al. Perfil epidemiológico e clínico de pacientes com suspeita de sepse e choque séptico em emergência hospitalar.

Reme: Rev Min Enferm. 2021;25:e-1415.

11. Latin American Sepsis Institute. Grupo Brasileiro de Avaliação de

Risco. Associação entre Sistema Manchester de Classificação de Risco

e Protocolo de Sepse. [citado 2024 Ago 5]. Disponível em: https://ilas.

org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/nota-tecnica01-2017.pdf

12. Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse. Implementação de protocolo

gerenciado de sepse protocolo clínico. [citado 2024 Ago 5].Disponível em: https://ilas.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/

protocolo-de-tratamento.pdf

13. Mok K, Christian MD, Nelson S, Burry L. Time to Administration of

Antibiotics among Inpatients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock.

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014;67(3):213-9.

14. Artigos sobre testes diagnósticos. [citado 2024 Out 1]. Disponível

em: https://www.sboc.org.br/app/webroot/leitura-critica/LEITURACRITICA_

C5.pdf

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.