Assessment of early sepsis recognition scores:

experience from a quarternary hospital in Brazil

Authors

  • Gabriela Franco Paes de Figueiredo
  • Marcia Ferreira dos Santos Silva
  • André Miguel Japiassu
  • Andrea D’Avila Freitas
  • Guilherme Bastos Fortes
  • Moyses Pinto Coelho Duarte Damasceno
  • Simone da Silva Vinhas
  • Vitor Dominato Rocha
  • Nathalia Antônio de Oliveira Velasco
  • Pedro Ramos Brandão de Melo
  • Aline D’Avila Pereira
  • Natalia Chilinque Zambão da Silva Universidade Federal Fluminense

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54143/jbmede.v4i3.204

Keywords:

Sepsis, Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Shock, septic

Abstract

 

 Objective: To analyze the effectiveness of screening tools for the early detection of sepsis. Methods: A prospective study that included 443 sepsis protocols from a quaternary hospital in Rio de Janeiro between January and August 2023. The sensitivity and specificity of three tools were compared: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and National Early Warning Score (NEWS). Results: Among patients with septic shock, 88% had a NEWS score > 4, while 74% of sepsis cases also had this score. NEWS stood out with a sensitivity of 87% for septic shock and 74% for sepsis, outperforming the other tools in both cases. Additionally, qSOFA was more specific, with 89% specificity for sepsis. Most patients were elderly and female, with initial screening indicating a high level of risk. Conclusion: The study underscores the importance of early identification of sepsis, recommending the use of NEWS as the primary tool in emergency services. Although conducted at a single center, the findings encourage the adoption of NEWS-based protocols to improve outcomes in sepsis management. 

References

1. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Biblioteca Virtual da Saúde. 13/9 – Dia

Mundial da Sepse. [citado 2024 Ago 5]. Disponível em: https://

bvsms.saude.gov.br/13-9-dia-mundial-da-sepse-3/

2. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan

DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and

mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease

Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200-211.

3. Gavelli F, Castello LM, Avanzi GC. Management of sepsis and

septic shock in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med.

2021;16(6):1649-61.

4. Sousa AS, Soares GR, Severo LT, Oliveira AP, Santarém MD,

Caregnato RC. Escores utilizados em suspeita/diagnóstico de

sepse. Rev Enferm UERJ. 2022;30:e67662.

5. Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Empresa Brasileira de Serviços

Hospitalares. Escore para alerta precoce. Brasília, DF: Ministério

da Educação; 2020 [citado 2024 Ago 5]. Disponível em: https://

www.gov.br/ebserh/pt-br/hospitais-universitarios/regiaosudeste/

hu-ufjf/saude/escore-para-alerta-precoce-1/escorepara-

alerta-precoce

6. Lohn A, Martins MS, Câmara LT, Malfussi LB, Lazzari DD,

Nascimento ER, et al. Perfil epidemiológico e clínico de pacientes

com suspeita de sepse e choque séptico em emergência hospitalar.

Reme: Rev Min Enferm. 2021;25:e-1415.

7. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane

D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for

Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-10.

8. Usman OA, Usman AA, Ward MA. Comparison of SIRS, qSOFA,

and NEWS for the early identification of sepsis in the Emergency

Department. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(8):1490-7.

9. Chakraborty RK, Burns B. Systemic Inflammatory Response

Syndrome. [Updated 2023 May 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet].

Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

10. Lohn A, Martins MS, Câmara LT, Malfussi LB, Lazzari DD,

Nascimento ER, et al. Perfil epidemiológico e clínico de pacientes com suspeita de sepse e choque séptico em emergência hospitalar.

Reme: Rev Min Enferm. 2021;25:e-1415.

11. Latin American Sepsis Institute. Grupo Brasileiro de Avaliação de

Risco. Associação entre Sistema Manchester de Classificação de Risco

e Protocolo de Sepse. [citado 2024 Ago 5]. Disponível em: https://ilas.

org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/nota-tecnica01-2017.pdf

12. Instituto Latino Americano de Sepse. Implementação de protocolo

gerenciado de sepse protocolo clínico. [citado 2024 Ago 5].Disponível em: https://ilas.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/

protocolo-de-tratamento.pdf

13. Mok K, Christian MD, Nelson S, Burry L. Time to Administration of

Antibiotics among Inpatients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock.

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014;67(3):213-9.

14. Artigos sobre testes diagnósticos. [citado 2024 Out 1]. Disponível

em: https://www.sboc.org.br/app/webroot/leitura-critica/LEITURACRITICA_

C5.pdf

Published

2024-10-25

How to Cite

Franco Paes de Figueiredo, G., Ferreira dos Santos Silva, M., Miguel Japiassu, A., D’Avila Freitas, A., Bastos Fortes, G., Pinto Coelho Duarte Damasceno, M., … Chilinque Zambão da Silva, N. (2024). Assessment of early sepsis recognition scores:: experience from a quarternary hospital in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.54143/jbmede.v4i3.204

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.