Characteristics of procedures performed during an emergency medicine residency in Brazil
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To assess the type, the frequency, and the success rates of procedures performed by Brazilian emergency medicine residents. Methods: This prospective observational study analyzed 1,623 procedures performed by 36 emergency medicine residents at a Brazilian residency program from February to December 2023. Residents recorded procedure type, supervision level, success, and complications using a standardized form. Procedural success, defined as completion without major difficulties, was the primary outcome. Success rates and procedural frequency were compared across residency years. Results: Central venous catheterization (28.5%) and orotracheal intubation (27.5%) were the most common procedures, with residents performing a mean of 14 and 13.5 annually, respectively. First-year residents performed most procedures (63.8%), achieving an 87.3% success rate, which improved to 94.6% and 94.0% in the second and third years. Second-year residents had 2.79 times higher odds (95%CI, 1.58-4.94) of successful procedures without difficulty compared to first-years. Rare procedures, including cricothyroidotomy and pericardiocentesis, were performed fewer than 10 times. Conclusion: Brazilian emergency medicine residents gain extensive procedural experience with improving success rates across training years. Addressing gaps in training for rare but critical procedures through simulation-based education is crucial. These findings inform curriculum development to ensure comprehensive procedural competence, particularly in low- and middle-income countries and new emergency medicine training programs.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
REFERENCES
1. Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387-396. doi:10.1056/NEJMra054784
2. Comissao Nacional de Residencia Medica. Matriz de Competencias - Programa Residencia Medica em Medicina de Emergencia. Published online July 6, 2021. Accessed July 13, 2024. https://www.gov.br/mec/pt-br/residencia-medica/resolucoes/resolucao-cnrm-n-12-de-6-de-julho-de-2021-dou-imprensa-nacional.pdf
3. Tran V, Cobbett J, Brichko L. Procedural competency in emergency medicine training. Emerg Med Australas EMA. 2018;30(1):103-106. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.12925
4. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. Accreditation requirements - V3 AC549. Published online 2023. Accessed July 13, 2024. https://acem.org.au/getmedia/003f59d2-b5c9-433f-9ff5-bb0843b2f950/AC549_FACEM_Training_Program_Site_Accreditation_Requirements-v1-02.aspx
5. Nettleman MD, Bock MJ, Nelson AP, Fieselmann J. Impact of procedure-related complications on patient outcome on a general medicine service. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9(2):66-70. doi:10.1007/BF02600202
6. Thomas HA, Beeson MS, Binder LS, et al. The 2005 Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine: The 2007 Update. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(8):776-779. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00194.x
7. Gottlieb M, Jordan J, Krzyzaniak S, et al. Trends in emergency medicine resident procedural reporting over a 10-year period. AEM Educ Train. 2023;7(1):e10841. doi:10.1002/aet2.10841
8. Bucher JT, Bryczkowski C, Wei G, et al. Procedure rates performed by emergency medicine residents: a retrospective review. Int J Emerg Med. 2018;11(1):7. doi:10.1186/s12245-018-0167-x
9. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Emergency Medicine Defined Key Index Procedure Minimums. Published online 11/20217. Accessed July 13, 2024. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programresources/em_key_index_procedure_minimums_103117.pdf
10. Oliveira J E Silva L, Herpich H, Puls HA, et al. Emergency medicine in Brazil: historical perspective, current status, and future challenges. Int J Emerg Med. 2021;14(1):79. doi:10.1186/s12245-021-00400-6
11. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2007;18(6):800-804. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654
12. Bernhard M, Mohr S, Weigand MA, Martin E, Walther A. Developing the skill of endotracheal intubation: implication for emergency medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(2):164-171. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02547.x
13. Lee GT, Park JE, Woo SY, et al. Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):14903. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19337-8